Delivery Date Deliverable Action Author Progress
April 29, 2016 Final Statistical Report Needs and expectations survey Pôle Mer Bretagne Atlantique Survey Online since: 23/02/2016 Survey opened for 2 months First report based on 199 responses on March 14, 2016 Final Report based on 212 responses on April 22, 2016
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
FOREWORD OBJECTIVES BlueBRIDGE aims to deploy services to different target audiences identified as potential end users. It became then essential to identify early in the project the needs of these stakeholders about the management and processing of data concerning fishing, aquaculture and environment sectors at European level. It will allow developing services and tools that meet end users expectations.
IMPLEMENTATION The survey was sent to the Pôle Mer Bretagne Atlantique contact database on February 23, 2016. A first statistical treatment was carried out on March 14, 2016 on 199 responses, 3 weeks after it went online. The present final report is based on 212 responses on April 22, 2016.
DOCUMENT PLAN 1. Global figures 1.1. Figures per questions 1.2. Conclusions 2. Focus on services and functionalities 3. Focus on private companies 2.1. Figures per question 2.2. Conclusions 4. Focus on academics 4.1. Figures per question 4.2. Conclusions 5. Annex 1 - Survey 6. Annex2 - Respondents list
NOTE 151 responses are fully filled but it does not mean that they are competed as respondents had the possibility to skip some questions. Indeed, it was not mandatory for respondent to fulfill the whole survey. It was still decided to take in account all the responses that were giving information even if the survey was not completed. Answers options were not exclusive. It must be considered in the results interpretation that a respondent may have ticked several or all possible answers. Page 2 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
1.
Global figures 1.1.
Figures per questions
Question 2 What is your organization type? Answer Options University Research Institute Environmental Consulting Company Company (including SME) Professional Organization Policy Maker Association Intergovernmental Organization Other
Response Percent
Response Count
9,9% 11,3% 8,5% 29,2% 6,6% 7,1% 10,4% 2,4% 14,6%
21 24 18 62 14 15 22 5 31
answered question skipped question
212 0
University
14,6%
2,4%
Research Institute
9,9%
Environmental Consulting Company 11,3%
Company (including SME)
10,4% 8,5% 7,1%
Professional Organization Policy Maker
6,6% 29,2%
Association Intergovernmental Organization Other
“Others” are mainly public bodies.
Question 3 What are the domains in which you are interested in? Answer Options Fisheries Aquaculture Environment
Response Percent 44,0% 47,3% 75,8%
answered question skipped question
Response Count 91 98 157 207 5 Page 3 of 26
Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
75,8%
80,0% 60,0%
44,0%
47,3%
Fisheries
Aquaculture
40,0% 20,0% 0,0% Environment
Question 4 What are the BlueBRI BlueBRIDGE services that might be of interest interest to you? Answer Options Stock Assessment Dashboard Global Record of Stocks and Fisheries Performance Evaluation in Aquaculture Dashboard Strategic Investments Analysis Dashboard Aquaculture Atlas Generation Protected Area Impact Maps Production Scientific Training Environments
Response Percent
Response Count
30,3% 38,8% 33,0% 48,4% 41,0% 54,8% 52,1%
57 73 62 91 77 103 98
answered question skipped question
57,0%
60,0%
51,5%
48,5%
50,0%
40,0%
39,5% 40,0%
188 11
33,0%
31,0%
30,0% 20,0% 10,0% Scientific Training Environments
Protected Area Impact Maps Production
Aquaculture Atlas Generation
Strategic Investments Analysis Dashboard
Performance Evaluation in Aquaculture Dashboard
Global Record of Stocks and Fisheries
Stock Assessment Dashboard
0,0%
Page 4 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Question 5 Which Which key functionalities of the BlueBRIDGE services might interest interest you? Answer Options
Response Percent
Response Count
64,8% 26,4% 57,2% 50,9% 64,8% 30,2% 7,5%
103 42 91 81 103 48 12
Data collection and management Data harmonization to international standards Data analysis, modeling/forecasting tools Data publication Data mapping tools/ Cartography Metadata management and master data management Other
answered question skipped question
64,8%
70%
159 53
64,8% 57,2%
60%
50,9%
50% 40%
30,2%
26,4%
30% 20%
7,5%
10%
Others
Metadata management and master data management
Data mapping tools/Cartography
Data publication
Data analysis, modeling/forecasting tools
Data harmonization to international standards
Data collection and management
0%
Question 6 Do you think the tools and services offered by the BlueBRIDGE project are relevant for your activity? Answer Answer Options Irrelevant Few relevant Moderately relevant Relevant Very relevant
Response Percent
Response Count
7,3% 2,7% % 2,7 24% 51% 51% 15%
11 4 36 77 22
answered question skipped question
150 49
Page 5 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
100
82 39
50
23
12
4
Irrelevant
Few relevant
0 Moderately relevant
Relevant
Very relevant
Question 7: Can you explain why? Here are listed several examples of answers given by respondents:
Very relevant - Relevant Data harmonization is particularly necessary in the context of a common and shared work. The access to functionalities such as mapping or data publishing is a + for associations (ease of access and understanding) - Association
They seem to cover a good range of functionalities necessary for research use - Association
Applicable to the reality
They will allow us to better understand the environment and its dynamics to better advise the fisheries and aquaculture sector - Research Institute These tools seem efficient - University Highly relevant to facilitate the dissemination and use of data by the largest number (homogeneous, reliable and traceable) - Research Institute
It currently lacks – Public body
- Company
Data is increasingly indispensable for understanding, analyzing and proposing management measures. Data banking tools, interoperability, analysis and retrieval (by mapping particular but also in the form of graphics and interactive digits) are required to value datasets - Association
For monitoring the evolution of environmental quality, uses and pressures – Public body
Inventorying data and qualifying it is the basis of all study Intergovernmental organization
The proposals largely scan multiple fields of representative activities – Public body
Moderately relevant This is much targeted on fishing as a production tool, but nothing appears on fishing as one use of the aquatic environment which must be reconciled with other uses of the marine environment. No ecological approach to fisheries, the approach proposed is only economic – Policy maker
Data already available on many websites (ORP, ICES, FAO ...) - University I do not see what differentiates the tools mentioned above of many existing and effective tools - Association Page 6 of 26
Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
The main difficulty is nestled in the validity of banked data, particularly in the fisheries sector, often making any downstream operation, no real relevance – Public body Ignores landed biomass, only those at sea – Association I do not get too concretely what your project is. What it is going to bring more compared to the existing – Research institute
Who will pay for this data?
- Company
Access to data and their quality to improve confidence – Research institute
Lack of functionalities
- Company
Databases provide accuracy and help decision making. This research helps to support professional with more transparency. Real instrument in favor of collaboration, consultation of data that can be done anytime and from anywhere! - Company
Few relevant - Irrelevant There are already many databases. What is missing is more their analysis than their management - University
Certainly for a business (large or medium) in a context of productivity and competitiveness but not for small company - Company
Few business data or market analyzes - Company
As all scientific projects, little commercial value - Company
We need a data monitoring in time on constant parameters to find out about what is happening at sea. The quality and consistency of observation should be preferred on the abundance of data – Public body
Question 8 Within the framework of your current activities, do you use? Answer Options Online databases Algorithms and modeling software Mapping software
Response Percent
Response Count
65,6% 43,2% 57,6%
82 54 72
answered question skipped question
125 87
Page 7 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
65,6%
70,0% 60,0% 50,0% 40,0% 30,0% 20,0% 10,0% 0,0%
57,6% 43,2%
Online databases (FAO, Quadrige, Eurostat, etc…)
Algorithms and modeling software (C++, Python, Java, Matlab, etc…)
Mapping software (ArcGis, MapInfo, Qgis, etc…)
Question 9 Below you can find some common issues encountered by stakeholders working in the marine/maritime marine/maritime field. Do you think BlueBRIDGE solutions may help you to overcome some of them? Answer Options Unavailability of data Harmonization of the data Complexity of the tools Impossibility for third parties to share or modify data Tool does not meet your expectations Other
Response Percent
Response Count
62,9% 67,1% 23,8% 32,2% 20,3% 3,5%
90 96 34 46 29 5
answered question skipped question
62,9%
67,1%
32,2% 23,8%
20,3%
Other
Tool doed not meet your expectations
Impossibility for third parties to share or modify data
Complexity of the tools
Harmonization of the data
3,5% Unavaibility of data
80,0% 70,0% 60,0% 50,0% 40,0% 30,0% 20,0% 10,0% 0,0%
143 69
Page 8 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Question 11 Would you be interested to atten attend a workshop presenting the different tools and services services offered by the BlueBRIDGE project? Answer Options Yes Maybe No
Response Percent
Response Count
24,4% 51,2% 24,4%
40 84 40
answered question skipped question
24,4%
164 48
Yes
24,4%
Maybe No
51,2%
Question 12 Would you be interested in receiving the BlueBRIDGE newsletter? Answer Options Yes No
Response Percent
Response Count
78,0% 22,0%
128 36
answered question skipped question
164 48
22,0% Yes 78,0%
No
Page 9 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
1.2.
Conclusions
First of all, some data shows a definite interest of survey respondents for the project, its services and tools, indeed:
More than three quarters of the respondents want to subscribe to the newsletter. Approximately 25% would like to attend a workshop at which can be added 50% of respondents who answered “maybe”.
Some results:
Intergovernmental organizations are very few present in the panel of survey respondents while a third of respondents are private companies. The other types of organizations are fairly equally represented. Respondents mostly represent the environmental sector, it is therefore logical that the VRE “Protected Area Impact Maps” comes out as the most interesting (54.8%). It is closely followed by the VRE “Scientific Training Environments” and then comes “Strategic investments in Aquaculture” which interests mostly private companies. The most mentioned functionalities are “cartography and mapping tools” and “data collection”. The “harmonization of data” and “metadata management” functionalities turn out to be less attractive to respondents. Half of respondents find that services and tools that will be developed during the project are relevant (15% found them very relevant). Less than 8% find little interest. 2/3 of respondents already use online databases. The tools less commonly used by respondents are modeling software and algorithms. Respondents believe that the project could help filling a lack of data and could help overcoming the problem of data harmonization at international level as well.
Furthermore, some results highlight some contradictions. For example, 67% of the question 9’s respondents think that the project services could help resolving harmonization issues despite that only 26% of the question 5’s respondents think that the harmonization of the data is a relevant functionality.
Page 10 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
2.
Focus on services and functionalities 2.1.
Services
120
23
100
15 15 10 80 14 60
10
12
7
5 1 7
8 2 7
14
10
6 1 6
12
40
4 6
5
3
14
11
3 6
Other
12
Universities
12
9 26
Intergovernmental organizations 26
6
6
30 20
Professional organizations
23 20 10
5 4
3 6
3 5
13
Global Record of Stocks and Fisheries
Performance Evaluation in Aquaculture Dashboard
Strategic Investments Analysis Dashboard
7
7
Stock Assessment Dashboard
9
10
Research Institutes
9
5 5
12
13
Private companies
8 Policy makers Scientific Training Environments
6
Protected Area Impact Maps Production
0
8
9
Aquaculture Atlas Generation
18
18
Environmental Consulting Companies Associations
Page 11 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
2.2 Functionalities
120
100 21
80
21
18 7
9 14
2 7 60
9 3
11
9
3 8
Other
7 3
9
Universities
7 10
22 23
7
5
Data collection and management
0
6
4 2 4
7
Data analysis / Modeling and Forecasting tools
6
9
Data harmonization to international standards
9 9
12
3 2 3 5
6
7 11
8 12
14 2 2 7 Metadata management / Master data management
5 2 4 20
10
Data mapping / Cartography
29
23 5
Data publication
40
Intergovernmental organizations
5
Professional organizations Research Institutes Private companies Policy makers Environmental Consulting Companies Associations
Page 12 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
3. Focus on Private companies 62 private companies (including SMEs) have filed the survey.
3.1.
Figures per questions
Question 3 What are the domains in which you are interested in? Response Percent 41.3% 41.3% 43.5% 61.2% 61.2%
Answer Options Fisheries Aquaculture Environment
Response Count 25 27 38
answered question skipped question
62 0
80,00% 61,20% 60,00% 41,30%
43,50%
Fisheries
Aquaculture
40,00% 20,00% 0,00% Environment
Question 4 What are the BlueBRI BlueBRIDGE services that might be of interest to you? Answer Options Stock Assessment Dashboard Global Record of Stocks and Fisheries Performance Evaluation in Aquaculture Dashboard Strategic Investments Analysis Dashboard Aquaculture Atlas Generation Protected Area Impact Maps Production Scientific Training Environments
Response Percent
Response Count
31% 31% 39.6% 31% 31% 44.8% 34.5% 44.8% 51.7% 51.7%
18 23 18 26 20 26 30
answered question skipped question
58 4
Page 13 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
60%
51,70% 44,80%
50% 40%
44,80%
39,60% 31%
34,50%
31%
30% 20% 10% Scientific Training Environments
Protected Area Impact Maps Production
Aquaculture Atlas Generation
Strategic Investments Analysis Dashboard
Performance Evaluation in Aquaculture Dashboard
Global Record of Stocks and Fisheries
Stock Assessment Dashboard
0%
Question 5 Which key functionalities of the BlueBRIDGE services might interest you? Answer Options Data collection and management Data harmonization to international standards Data analysis / Modeling, forecasting tools Data publication Data mapping tools / Cartography Metadata management and master data management Other
Response Percent
Response Count
69.8 69.8% .8% 21% 53.5% 51.1% 53.5% 32.5% 7%
30 9 23 22 23 14 3
answered an swered question skipped question
69,80% 53,50%
51,10%
53,50% 32,50%
21%
Other
Metadata management and master data management
Data mapping tools / Cartography
Data publication
Data analysis / Modeling, forecasting tools
Data harmonization to international standards
7% Data collection and management
80,00% 70,00% 60,00% 50,00% 40,00% 30,00% 20,00% 10,00% 0,00%
43 19
Page 14 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Question 8 Within the framework of your activity, do you use? Answer Options Online databases Algorithms and modeling software Mapping software
Response Percent
Response Count
46.5% 46.5% 30.2% 30.2% 32.5%
20 13 14
answered answ ered question skipped question
60,00%
43 19
46,50% 30,20%
32,50%
Algorithms and modeling software
Mapping software
40,00% 20,00% 0,00% Online databases
Question 9 Do you think BlueBRIDGE solutions may help you to overcome some of the common issues encountered by users and indicated below? Answer Options Unavailability of data Harmonization of data Complexity of the tool Impossibility for third parties to share or modify data Tool does not meet your expectations Other
Response Percent
Response Count
57.8% 63.1% 63.1% 31.5% 31.5% 21% 21% -
22 24 12 12 8 0
answered question skipped question
57,80%
63,10% 31,50%
31,50% 21%
Other
Tool does not meet your expectations
Impossibility for third parties to share or modify data
Complexity of the tool
Harmonization of data
0 Unavailability of data
70,00% 60,00% 50,00% 40,00% 30,00% 20,00% 10,00% 0,00%
38 24
Page 15 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Question 11 Would you be interested to atten attend a workshop presenting the different tools and services offered by the BlueBRIDGE project? Answer Options Yes Maybe No
Response Percent
Response Count
30.4% 41.3 .3% 41 .3% 28.2% 28.2%
14 19 13
answered question skipped question
28,20%
30,40%
46 16
Yes Maybe No
41,30%
2.2. Conclusions 62 private companies responded, representing roughly 30% of surveys. This is encouraging in order to find “Interested parties”. Here are some first conclusions we can draw from these results:
These companies are mostly identified as working in the environment field (61.2%) and in a relatively similar proportion in the fishing and aquaculture sectors (respectively 41.3% and 43.5%). More than a half of private companies are interested in the scientific training VRE which is a surprise considering that it is rather intended to universities or research institutes. The second services of interest for private companies are “Strategic investments in Aquaculture” which makes sense since this is the most interesting service in a business perspective and “Protected area impact maps”. Private companies are very interested in the functionality “data collection and management", so we can therefore assume that they want to use the services as a database. As a matter of fact, 46.5% of private companies have declared that they already use online databases. Some of the functionalities that will be developed in the different VREs are less interesting for them such as harmonization of the data (21%) and metadata management (32.5%).
Page 16 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
4.
Focus on academics
This focus is based on 45 responses since we consider in this category, both universities and research institutes, ie 1/5 of the respondents.
4.1.
Figures per questions
Question 3 What are the domains in which you are interested in? Response Percent 33.3% 45.2% 85.7%
Answer Options Fisheries Aquaculture Environment
Response Response Count 14 19 36
answered question skipped question
100,00%
42 3
85,70%
80,00% 60,00% 40,00%
45,20% 33,30%
20,00% 0,00% Fisheries
Aquaculture
Environment
Question 4 What are the BlueBRI BlueBRIDGE services that might be of interest to you? Answer Options Stock Assessment Dashboard Global Record of Stocks and Fisheries Performance Evaluation in Aquaculture Dashboard Strategic Investments Analysis Dashboard Aquaculture Atlas Generation Protected Area Impact Maps Production Scientific Training Environments
Response Percent
Response Count
23.2% 34.8% 25.5% 41.8% 34.8% 51.1% 60.4%
10 15 11 18 15 22 26
answered question skipped question
43 2
Page 17 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
70,00%
60,40%
60,00%
51,10%
50,00%
41,80% 34,80%
40,00% 30,00%
34,80% 25,50%
23,20%
20,00% 10,00% Scientific Training Environments
Protected Area Impact Maps Production
Aquaculture Atlas Generation
Strategic Investments Analysis Dashboard
Performance Evaluation in Aquaculture Dashboard
Global Record of Stocks and Fisheries
Stock Assessment Dashboard
0,00%
Question 5 Which key functionalities of the BlueBRIDGE services might interest you? Answer Options
Response Percent
Response Count
58.8% 35.2% 55.8% 35.2% 47% 23.5% -
20 12 19 12 16 8 0
Data collection and management Data harmonization to international standards Data analysis / Modeling, forecasting tools Data publication Data mapping tools / Cartography Metadata management and master data management Other
answered question skipped question
58,80%
55,80% 47% 35,20%
35,20% 23,50%
Other
Metadata management and master data management
Data mapping tools / Cartography
Data publication
Data analysis / Modeling, forecasting tools
Data harmonization to international standards
0 Data collection and management
70,00% 60,00% 50,00% 40,00% 30,00% 20,00% 10,00% 0,00%
34 11
Page 18 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Question 8 Within the framework of your activity, do you use? Answer Options Online databases Algorithms and modeling software Mapping software
Response Percent
Response Count
66.6% 46.6% 50%
20 14 15
answered question skipped question
30 15
66,60%
80,00% 60,00% 40,00% 20,00% 0,00%
Online databases
46,60%
50%
Algorithms and modeling software
Mapping software
Question 9 Do you think BlueBRIDGE solutions may help you to overcome some of the common issues encountered by users and indicated below? Answer Options Unavailability of data Harmonization of data Complexity of the tool Impossibility for third parties to share or modify data Tool does not meet your expectations Other
Response Percent
Response Count
64.5% 64.5% 22.5% 22.5% 12.9% -
20 20 7 7 4 0
answered question skipped question
70,00% 60,00% 50,00% 40,00% 30,00% 20,00% 10,00% 0,00%
64,50%
31 14
64,50%
22,50%
22,50% 12,90% 0
Unavailability Harmonization Complexity of Impossibility Tool does not of data of data the tool for third meet your parties to expectations share or modify data
Other
Page 19 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Question 11 Would you be interested to atten attend a workshop presenting the different tools and services offered by the BlueBRIDGE project? Answer Options Yes Maybe No
Response Percent
Response Count
17.9% 57.1% 25%
5 16 7
answered question skipped question
25%
28 17
17,90% Yes Maybe 57,10%
No
3.2. Conclusions Respondents from universities and research institutes who answered the survey are from a major part linked to the environment sector (85.7%). The VRE that interest them the most is, without surprise, “Scientific training environment” (60.4%) followed by the “Protected Area Impact Maps” VRE (51.1%) what makes sense given that most of them are working on environmental issues. The main functionalities that interest them are “data collection and management” (58.8%), “data analysis/modeling and forecasting tools” (55.8%) and “mapping tools/cartography” (47%). Two thirds of them already use online databases and nearly half use modeling and mapping software for their current activities.
The most common issues linked to the utilization of such tools that they think BlueBRIDGE services would overcome are “Unavailability of data” and “Harmonization of data” (64.5% both). These stakeholders seem to be interested by the project and its results given that three quarters of the respondents want or may want to attend a workshop presenting the BlueBRIDGE services and functionalities.
Page 20 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Annex 1. Survey
Page 21 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Page 22 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Page 23 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Annex 2. Respondents List General Information
Name
Country Email adress
Type of Organization
reflex PE Association Surfrider Foundation Europe
demeunynck Jean Yves
Belgique
[email protected]
Other: Funder
Néollier Marie-Amélie
France
[email protected]
Association
AGLIA A A FINEVAL
GATEL François
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
NODET ANTOINE
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Engineering society
CEFREM - CREM ODE
Lenfant Philippe
France
[email protected]
University
HIELARD GAELLE
FRANCE
[email protected]
Policy maker
EBS Technology Nantes métropole / DGDEAI
BERTRON Olivier
France
[email protected]
Private company
Le Goff Florence
France
[email protected]
Policy maker
GRAND PORT MARITIME DE BORDEAUX conserverie chancerelle
Fabrice KLEIN
France
[email protected]
Other: Public body
bellavoi didier
france
[email protected]
Private company
IPSIDE AGROCAMPUS OUEST-Beg Meil
COTONNEC Isabelle
France
[email protected]
Private company
SPINEC Florent
France
[email protected]
Other: Research Institute
collectivité- finistère L'Oursine de Ré
koller hélène
france
[email protected]
Policy maker
Yvan Le Gall
France
[email protected]
Private company
Journal OUEST- FRANCE Finistère OMA SARL
christian Gouerou
France
[email protected]
Private company
Stéphane Olivier
France
[email protected]
Private company
France Energies Marines Mairie de Trégunc
LE ROUX Gaëlle
France
[email protected]
Association
DE BAETS Martin
France
[email protected]
Professional organization
CÖTES D'ARMOR DEVELOPPEMENT DIGINEXT
HALARY Christophe
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
FOURQUET Thomas
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Station de biologie marine Technopôle Brest Iroise
DENIS Francoise
France
[email protected]
University
Vandenbroucke Eric
France
[email protected]
Association
Temis Conseil Pole mer Méditerranée
CHAPMAN MARC
TAHITI
[email protected]
Professional organization
Herrouin Guy
France
[email protected]
Association
France Haliotis finistère
Sylvain Huchette
France
[email protected]
Private company
Pencalet Françoise
france
[email protected]
Policy maker
AVELAJ DIRM NAMO / MCPML
Michel Chapalain
France
[email protected]
Private company
HENO Laurie-Anne
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
DYNAMOCEAN Ifremer
DRONIOU ELOI
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
Ybert Sébastien
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
ECCS Marine 56 -85 Université de Toulon
NICOLEAU Patrick
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
SAILLARD Marc
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
ANSES CDPMEM 56
MORIN Thierry
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Sanitary safety agency
Roche Emilie
FRANCE
[email protected]
Professional organization
Merinov - biologiste Ministère de l'industrie
Lionard Marie
FRANCE
[email protected]
Institut de recherche
Decorzent Guillaume
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
Agence de l'eau Loire Bretagne Erwan Frick
LE QUILLEC REGIS
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
Erwan Frick
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
WICS NAVAL EPCI
Yann Lautrédou
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
FRANCE
[email protected]
Policy maker
Meteodyn - Loire-Atlantique SAS SOCOREX
DO Minh-Thang
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
DALIBON SANDRA
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
CRC Méditerranee Laboratoire de recherche
Adeline PERIGNON
FRANCE
[email protected]
Professional organization
Sciandra Antoine
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
DRAAF BRED
Boitard Jean-Yves
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
Cadic Gérard
FRANCE
gé
[email protected]
Private company
région bretagne UQAR
guiton yvan
FRANCE
[email protected]
Policy maker
Ouellet
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
Sea.ing MH2
Prodhomme Johann
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
Dialinas
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
Agence de l'eau Loire Bretagne Office De l'Eau Martinique IDEE
FERA Philippe
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
MANGEOT Loïc
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
Cochet
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
Conseil Supérieur de la Marine Marchande IDEE
BERTHET Jean-Marie
FRANCE
[email protected] Other: Public body
Trichereau Jacques
FRANCE
[email protected]
Direction interrégionale de la mer Diana Naturals
LA PRAIRIE Xavier
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
Coursault Antoine
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
CREDIT MARITIME ATLANTIQUE Maison de l'Emploi et Formation Cotentin
FOURE PATRICK
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Bank
DUBOIS MICHEL
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
Departement d'ille-et-vialine NOVELIOS
Aubin-Pinchon Sandrine
FRANCE
sandrine.aubin-pinchon @ille-et-vilaine.fr
Collectivité
Olivier LUNEL
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
DIRECCTE PAYS DE LA LOIRE cluster maritime français
QUERE YANN
FRANCE
[email protected]
Intergovernmental organization
perennez philippe
FRANCE
[email protected]
Professional organization
SCEA LA VIVARAISE tematys
ANNABELLE NEAU
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
cochard jacques
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Laboratoire départemental du Var affaires maritimes
Barnabot Christophe
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
Nourrain Olivier
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
CROSS CORSEN Add-Modules
BATAIL Gaëlig
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
Debled Antoine
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Conseil régional des Pays de la Loire AMO sarl-29
Champenois Jennifer
FRANCE
[email protected]
Policy maker
QUERE PHILIPPE
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
CODEVA
SASSIER JEAN MARC
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Environmental consulting company
Page 24 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Wavestar
MARQUIS Laurent
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
ECOVALGUE COLIBRI COMMUNICATION
Dobriansky stéphane
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Michèle Meillac
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
gep aftp ARTELIA
perreau philippe
FRANCE
[email protected]
Professional organization
brebion stephane
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
Temergie SOCOREX SAS
Courtois Morgan
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
Dalla-Torre Pierre
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Chercheur Deprofundis
Thierry Laugier
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
Ina Tautu
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
World Ocean Council ACB
Valentin Christine
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
Le Guellaff Yann
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
IRD CCI Pays de la Loire
Debitus Cécile
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
JAN Philippe
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
Université de Nantes ANEF
CASARI Pascal
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
ETT MARZIOU CHRISTOPHE Spiruline AtoufredReimund FrédérichantonnayReimund Frédéric
Grandguillot Alain
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Planète Mer Eléo Conseil 44
Diméglio Tristan
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
Cosnard Maité
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
WavEC, Offshore Renewables SATIF
Matos Nuno
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
hg
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
GIPSA-LAB barillec
mars jerome
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
buttet maurice
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Wenceslas Chancerelle Cluster Maritime Polynésie
Gonnet Elisabeth
FRANCE
elisabeth.zafiropoulos@chancerelle
Private company
Renard Stephane
FRANCE
[email protected]
Professional organization
IDIL Fibres Optiques laboratoire PBS
LE BOUDEC Patrice
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
le cerf didier
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
UBO Centre de Météorologie Spatiale
Treguer Paul
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
ROQUET Hervé
FRANCE
[email protected]
Intergovernmental organization
Université de Nantes Pennel & Flipo
Guillotreau Patrice
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
THEY Fabrice
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
SHOM Terra Maris
STEPHAN Yann
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
Le Tixerant Matthieu
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
CEPS ACTIMAR
Chauty Yann
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
VIGIER Laurent
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Conseil Régional de Bretagne COBRENORD
LEBRUN GHISLAINE
FRANCE
[email protected]
Policy maker
LAVIALLE GAËL
FRANCE
[email protected]
Professional organization
AQUA TECHNA Guy cotten
Le Reste Guillaume
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Pascal beurier
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
COCHET Environnement Marine Renewable Energy Group Ltd
COCHET Hélène
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
LONGMORE Christopher
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
LOIRE ATLANTIQUE PECHE ET PLAISANCE chercheur-33
PALLADIN MAX
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
Tran Damien
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
sas Les truites du Ster-Goz ANTIPOLMER CONSEIL
Ladurée Hervé
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Consultancy
Cerutti Jean-Bernard
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Consultancy
Fish-Pass Meteodyn
Le Grel Laurent
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
BERTHAUT-GERENTES Julien
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
VIACREATIS Innovations Bleues
Morizur Marie-Françoise
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Hainglaise Jean-charles
FRANCE
[email protected]
Association
Pôle métropolitain du Pays de Brest PRAXIDEV
DEMANGEON Luce
FRANCE
[email protected]
Policy maker
GILLES COFFIN
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
Abyss Ingredients GCFT
Alexis Mehaignerie
FRANCE
alexis@abyss-ingredients
Private company
Robert Henri
FRANCE
[email protected]
Intergovernmental organization
Conseil Regional de Bretagne CGG - R&D
Pennanguer Stephane
FRANCE
[email protected]
Policy maker
Richer de Forges Hervé
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
OCTECH A-D-E MARINE
Pochat Alain
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
LE GALL Christian
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
OSU de lyon allemand pascal Communauté d'Agglomération Toulon Provence Méditerranée QUEFFEULOU Guirec Ecole Centrale Marseille Kimmoun Olivier
FRANCE
[email protected]
Policy maker
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
BRGM Étudiante
Roy Stéphane
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
Anne COCHERIL
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
Biologie ID 4 CAR 44
NAZIH El-Hassane
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
PEUROU Yvon
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Business cluster
CNRS Pôle Cristal
Gaill françoise
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
Bazantay Frédéric
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
CCI Bretagne Cnam/Intechmer
CARIOU Roland
FRANCE
[email protected]
Professional organization
MEAR Yann
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
CNRS- Isère BRGM
Franzetti Bruno
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
Palvadeau Eric
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
CCI Côte d'Opale Ecam Rennes - Ille et Vilaine
labarre pascal
FRANCE
[email protected]
Policy maker
Jihed FLIFLA
University
FRANCE
[email protected]
Université Rennes 1 - CREM UMR CNRS 3211 Martin Dominique ITAVI Service Aquaculture Tocqueville Aurélien
FRANCE
[email protected]
University
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Technical center
SMEL
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Technical center
RICHARD Olivier
Page 25 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report
BlueBRIDGE - 675680
Université de Rennes Jarde Emilie FRANCE MAREE Demoulin Xavier FRANCE Olmix Group Cavarec Maxime FRANCE PMBA Patrick GRIVEAU FRANCE Algues et Mer ROLLAND Lydia FRANCE Actimar SAS - 29 Mazé Jean-Pierre FRANCE Aleor SAS Christophe Caudan FRANCE Technopôle Brest Iroise Bazin Jérémie FRANCE IDMer Bergé Jean-Pascal FRANCE Unité experimentale Labbé Laurent FRANCE Comité Régional Conchylicole bretagne Sud GACHELIN Sonia FRANCE SHOM Le Faou Yann FRANCE IDMER-Morbihan Lavolé Jean-Luc FRANCE SA Coopérative Ar Mor Glaz Le Moigne Philippe FRANCE econav - 29 Berrehouc Yveline FRANCE Marinelec Technologies Citeau Pascal FRANCE Comité Départemental des pêches maritimes etLedes Guennec élevages Solenne marins du Finistère FRANCE Technopole Quimper-Cornouaille Le Den Ronan FRANCE INRA MEDALE FRANCE NKE Instrumentation LE BLEIS JC FRANCE CNPMEM Cloâtre Thomas FRANCE Fiiish - 29 Orlach Frédéric FRANCE capitainerie Burnel Didier FRANCE AGROCAMPUS OUEST Lesueur Marie FRANCE SABLIERES DE L ATLANTQUE Garçon Agnès FRANCE CLS HAJDUCH Guillaume FRANCE SeaBird Marie CHAUVEL FRANCE SETUDE RENOULT Thomas FRANCE environnement guerin anais FRANCE SPF - R&D HERAULT Mikael FRANCE Université de Caen dickel ludovic FRANCE Ifremer/ Ressources biologiques Buchet Vincent FRANCE CDO INNOV CHUPIN Cédric FRANCE SICA LE GOUESSANT camus samuel FRANCE laboratoire ICI fredouet charles-henri FRANCE recherche et développement Flochlay Alicia FRANCE SEAPROVEN GARNIER Jean-Pierre FRANCE EXWEXS Messager Christophe FRANCE Ifremer, RDT/LDCM dreanno catherine FRANCE Olmix Group Cavarec Maxime FRANCE CNRS-Roscoff Ras Monique FRANCE Agence des aires marines protégées CORMAN David FRANCE IFREMER BERGER Laurent FRANCE Station Biologique de Roscoff (UPMC - CNRS) KERVELLA FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Association
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Other: Private company
[email protected]
Association
[email protected]
Association
[email protected]
Research institute
[email protected]
Professional organization
[email protected]
Intergovernmental organization
[email protected]
Association
[email protected]
Professional organization
[email protected]
Association
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Professional organization
[email protected]
Association
[email protected]
Research institute
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Professional organization
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
University
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
University
[email protected]
Research institute
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
University
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Research institute
[email protected]
Private company
[email protected]
Research institute
[email protected]
Other: Public body
[email protected]
Research institute
[email protected]
Research institute
CAB Mission Capécure 2020
CALON Jean-Noël
FRANCE
[email protected]
Other: Public body
Ecole Navale
RAY Cyril
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
CMRE
CAMOSSI Elena
ITALY
[email protected]
Intergovernmental organization
MERINOV
COULOMBE Francis
CANDADA
[email protected]
Research institute
IFREMER
SATRA Catherine
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research institute
Seascape
MARTIN MIGUEZ Belen
BELGIQUE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
CIDCO
LAFLAMME Jean
CANADA
[email protected]
Research institute
G-TEC
THOIRON Philippe
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
AKAJOULE
LAURENT Faustine
FRANCE
[email protected]
Environmental consulting company
EDF R&D-Departement LNHE
MATTEI Jean-Daniel
FRANCE
[email protected]
Research and development department
CAYAMBE Partners
CARIOU Tanguy
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Le Drezen
CANTE Thierry
FRANCE
[email protected]
Private company
Page 26 of 26 Needs and expectations survey statistical report