Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

E(u,v) is the square modulus of cross correlation between diffracted amplitude and SMF functions: U. E(u). G. W. (u) ... Angel Cross. X array with phase chopping.
626KB taille 2 téléchargements 414 vues
Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

François Hénault UMR 6525 CNRS H. FIZEAU – UNS, OCA Avenue Nicolas Copernic 06130 GRASSE - FRANCE

Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

Marseille, June 26th 2008

1

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

In the frame of Darwin/TPF-I space missions: Do nulling maps depend on the types of Spatial Filtering and Achromatic Phase Shifting (APS) devices ?

Previous publications • “Design of achromatic phase shifters for spaceborne nulling interferometry,” Opt. Lett. 31, 3635-3637 (2006) • “Computing extinction maps of star nulling interferometers,” Opt. Exp. 16, 4537-4546 (2008)

Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

Marseille, June 26th 2008

2

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

Redefining the nulling ratio T(u,v) Fringes TMax T’Max

Envelope

Transmission curve T’’Max

TMin

U Achieved Null

0

• N = TMin/T’Max instead of TMin/TMax • N may change with the employed spatial filtering device Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

Marseille, June 26th 2008

3

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

V

On-sky angular coordinates

U

Entrance pupil plane D

ZS

T1

Y

v

X

u

T2 BY

Recombination plane

Y

OS

X

T4 BX

T3

Y’

O

Detector plane

X’

D F

O’ y’

Coordinates systems

Z

x’ Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

Marseille, June 26th 2008

4

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

Case of pinhole filtering, APS with no Pupil-flip • Nulling map is the product of the fringe pattern F(u,v) with an envelope E(u,v) • E(u,v) is the cross correlation of PSF and pinhole functions:

{

}

ˆ 2 ⊗ B (Fu, Fv) S T(u, v) = F(u, v) × B D P P 2

E(u)

BP(u)

BD(u)

P

⊗ PSF

Pinhole

Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

= Actual FoV Marseille, June 26th 2008

U 5

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

Case of Single Mode Fiber (SMF) filtering, any type of APS • E(u,v) is the square modulus of cross correlation between diffracted amplitude and SMF functions: 2

2

ˆ (u, v) ∝ F(u, v) × B ˆ ⊗ G (Fu, Fv) T(u, v) = A D W GW(u)

BD(u)

|…|2 =

⊗ Diffacted amplitude

E(u)

W

SMF

Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

Actual FoV

Marseille, June 26th 2008

U 6

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

Example of three well-known configurations Bracewell

Angel Cross

Y

Y

X array with phase chopping Y

ϕ1= 0

ϕ2= π ϕ2= π

ϕ1= 0 OS

D D

X

BX

OS

D

X

BY

OS

N (number of apertures) 2 4 4

BX (baseline along X) 50 m 50 m 100 m

4

100 m

Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

BX

ϕ4= π

±

ϕ3= 0

X

BY

BX

Type of interferometer Bracewell Angel Cross Stretched X-array, no phase chopping Stretched X-array with phase chopping

ϕ1= 0

ϕ2= ±π/2

ϕ3= π/2

ϕ4= π

BY (baseline Analytical expressions of fringe patterns along Y) – F(u,v) = sin2(πBXu/λ) 50 m F(u,v) = sin2(πBXu/λ) sin2(πBYv/λ) 25 m F–(u,v) = [1+sin(2πBXu/λ)] sin2(πBYv/λ) / 2 25 m

F(u,v) = sin(2πBXu/λ) sin2(πBYv/λ) Marseille, June 26th 2008

7

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

First results on a Bracewell interferometer Pinhole filtering, APS with no Pupil-flip

25 mas

• • •

Pinhole filtering, Pupil-flip APS

SMF filtering

λ = 1 µm, D = 20 m, B = 100 m

Widest FoV achieved with pinhole filtering, APS with no Pupil-flip Worst results with pinhole filtering associated to Pupil-flip APS → Technical solution to be ruled out SMF filtering not sensitive to APS type if all functions are centro-symmetric

Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

Marseille, June 26th 2008

8

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

Spectral dependency λ = 1 µm, ∆λ = 0.5 µm Extinction ratios for different SF devices 1 0.9

Pinhole, no FoV-reversal

0.8

SMF

Pinhole filtering

Extinction ratio

0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 -12

-9

-6

-3

0

3

6

9

12

U (mas)

SMF filtering

• Major conclusions unchanged Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

Marseille, June 26th 2008

9

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

Nulling maps with pinholes or SMF spatial filtering λ = 10 µm, D = 5 m, B = 25-100 m, λ/∆ ∆λ = 40

X array, 4x-stretched, no phase chopping

X array, 4x-stretched, with phase chopping

Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

200 mas

SMF filtering

1 arcsec

Pinhole filtering

Angel Cross

Marseille, June 26th 2008

10

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

“Theta-Lambda” diagrams X array, 4x-stretched, with phase chopping

Angel Cross

Bracewell Pinhole filtering

5 µm 10 µm 15 µm

SMF filtering

5 µm 10 µm 15 µm 0

π



0

π



0

π



• Pinhole filtering looks better but… – Only one pinhole/SMF was used on the whole spectral band – Numerical model to be improved Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

Marseille, June 26th 2008

11

Fine art of computing nulling interferometer maps

Conclusions • Pinhole filtering is back in the race ! – Provides wider FoVs suitable for blind planet detection

• Future works on numerical model – Introduction of different pinholes/SMFs on the whole spectral band – Introduction of real SMF modes (Bessel functions) – Improvement of cross correlation algorithm (speed)

• It is likely that a future Darwin/TPF-I optical payload shall provide both types of spatial filtering (pinholes and SMFs)

Conference 7013: Optical and Infrared Interferometry

Marseille, June 26th 2008

12