Neoliberal capitalism Three stylized facts - Hussonet

Jun 10, 2011 - 1985. 1990. 1995. 2000. 2005. United States. Germany+France+United Kingdom. Average weighted by GDP. Sources: National accounts ...
287KB taille 12 téléchargements 286 vues
“Getting out of the crisis: the role of Income Distribution” Symposium CEPN – Groupe AMPK “Post-Keynesian analyses and modeling” Saint-Denis, June 9th and 10st 2011

Growth and Income Distribution: How to Understand the Crisis and Really Get Out of It

(if possible)

Michel Husson (IRES) http://hussonet.free.fr

Neoliberal capitalism Three stylized facts 1. Fall in the wage share / increased rate of profit 2. Stagnation of the rate of accumulation 3. Increase in the share of dividends

Wage share in value added USA + EU + Japan, 1960-2008 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

Average weighted by GDP Source: European Commission, Ameco Database

The profit rate in the United States and in Europe. 1950-2008 30 28 26

United States

24 22 20 18 16 14 12

Germany+France+United Kingdom

10

1950

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

Average weighted by GDP. Sources: National accounts

2005

Profit and Investment USA + EU + Japan, 1960-2008

% of value added. Average weighted by GDP Source: European Commission, Ameco database

Net Dividends as % of the wage bill United States, France, United Kingdom, 1960-2008 13

30

12

28

11

26

10

24

9

22

8

20

7

18

6

16

5

14

4

12

3

France

United States

United Kingdom (right scale)

2

10 8

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis, INSEE, United Kingdom Economic Accounts

Financialisation and Unemployment EU15 1965-2007 12

130

11

120

10

110

9

100

8

90

7

80

6

70

5

60

4

50

Unemployment rate

3

Rate of financialisation

2 1

1965

40 30 20

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

Source: European Commission, Ameco database

Wages and private consumption United States 1960-2008

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

2005

Wages and private consumption European Union 1960-2008

Source: European Commission, Ameco database

Two “scissors” • Profit / Accumulation • Wage bill / Consumption

Two explanations (not contradictory) • Predatory finance • Mismatch between social demand and capitalist criteria

The Post-Keynesian Firm under Financialization (Stockhammer’s Case)

Thomas Dallery “Post-Keynesian Theories of the Firm under Financialization” Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol.41 n°4, 2009

A general scheme of analysis

Four major contradictions: towards a “chaotic regulation” Dilemma of distribution profitability vs employment

Dilemma of globalisation imbalances vs global growth

Budgetary dilemma

austerity vs social spending

European dilemma

everyone for themselves vs coordination

Growth, employment and unemployment EU15 2001-2015

Three questions

1. When incomes grows, who gains ? http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/pages/interactive?/ Economic Policy Institute

Between 1987 and 2007 Average incomes in the U.S. grew by $15,104 The richest 10% got 84% of that growth The bottom 90% shared 16%

2. Does growth really create jobs ?

Productivity and growth - France 1950-2008

3. Is growth compatible with the goals for reducing CO2 emissions ?

Main ingredients for an alternative Priority to social needs

change in the income redistribution reduction of working time

Euroconvergence

unified taxation of capital European budget for harmonization European minimum wage

A last question

Can this “unleashed capitalism” be regulated ?