Aim • Can we design an optimal policy? Does there exist an optimal rule? • What should the goals of monetary policy be? • Common answer: evaluate policies according to a loss function of the form [∞ ] ∑ ( ) τ ⋆ 2 ⋆ 2 Ω=E β (πt+τ − πt+τ ) + F(yt+τ − yt+τ ) τ =0
• Leaves many questions open: • • • • • •
What is the right form of such a criterion? What are the appropriate target values πt⋆ and y⋆t ? What is the appropriate relative weight, F? Price or inflation stabilization? Which measures of inflation and output gap? Are expected and unexpected variations equally costly? 2/17
General Principle
• To achieve efficient allocation of resources • Distortions get in the way of efficiency. • Questions: • What kind of distortions are present in the NK model? • What kind of tools are available to the monetary authorities for dealing with these distortions?
3/17
Distortions
• Monopolistic distortion =⇒ Too little output. • Nominal price rigidity=⇒ 2 implications: 1. Variable markup (while constant under flexible prices) 2. Relative price distortion (symmetric preferences, same MRT, yet relative prices differ because of a-synchronized price setting)
• Nominal frictions (such as the constraint that transactions require the use of money) • Other distortions (such as taxes, minimum wages, private information, etc.) • The nature of optimal monetary policy depends on • which of these distortions are present • whether any of these distortions can be –indirectly– countered by monetary policy.
4/17
Optimal Policy
• Eliminate distortions: want to replicate the flexible price economy (the optimal allocation) • How to implement it? • Full price stabilization: Pt (i) = Pt (j) = Pt = P. • Why? • Since Wt is the same for all firms, then under the policy, output is the same for all firms. • Therefore the marginal cost and the markup is the same for all firms whether they can reset their price or not =⇒ Eliminate dispersion • If no dispersion, then markup is constant
• A constant subsidy will eliminate distortions from imperfect competition
5/17
The Objective of the Central Bank • Woodford (2003, Chapter 6): The central bank aims at maximizing the welfare of the agents • Assumption: There exists a fiscal policy that takes care of real distortions (fiscal transfer to compensate for the markup) • Hence the steady–state does not feature any distortions • Implication: Welfare loss takes the form ∞
) 1 ∑ t( 2 bt + λb x2t E0 β π 2 t=0
• Concerns for inflation and output gap. • Minimum when π bt = b xt = 0 • Price stability is an implication of the pursuit of efficiency, not an ad hoc objective. • Price stability implies output gap stability. 6/17
The Objective of the Central Bank
• The Central bank understands the mechanics of the economy • It takes these mechanisms into account when it designs the optimal policy • For the basic model, we have 1 b (Rt − Et π bt+1 ) σc bt π bt = κb xt + βEt π bt+1 + u b xt = Etb xt+1 −
bt a cost push shock, satisfying where b xt is the output gap and u b t = ρu u bt−1 + εt u
7/17
The Objective of the Central Bank • The problem of the Central bank is then ∞
subject to bt π bt = κb xt + βEt π bt+1 + u 1 b b xt = Etb bt+1 − rnt ) xt+1 − (R t − Et π σc where λ = κ/θ. • Note that the second equation will give us the nominal interest rate, it does not really matter for the problem. 8/17
2 possible behaviors!
• Discretion • Under discretion the bank does not commit to any behavior, and re–optimize in each and every period • The bank therefore considers each period independently from the other ones • The behavior ought to change in each period
• Full commitment • The bank fully commit to a rule for all the future periods • Intertemporal linkages • Builds some credibility
9/17
Optimal Policy under Discretion
• The bank does not commit to any behavior, and re–optimize in each and every period • The program is a sequence of static problems ) 1( 2 π bt + λb x2t {b xt ,b πt }t=0 2 min∞
subject to π bt = κb xt + ωt bt is taken as given by the central bank where ωt ≡ βEt π bt+1 + u
10/17
Optimal Policy under Discretion • Lagrangian L =
) 1( 2 π bt + λb x2t + qt (b πt − κb xt − ω t ) 2
• Leads to optimal behavior b xt = −θb πt • In response to inflationary pressures, the central bank must drive output below its efficient level • This creates a negative output gap =⇒ dampens inflationary pressures • “Leaning against the wind policy”: π bt =
1 θ ut and b xt = − ut 1 − βρu + θκ 1 − βρu + θκ
• How to operationalize it? 11/17
Optimal Policy under Discretion
• Plug the solution in the IS curve to get Rt =
ρu + σc θ(1 − ρu ) − kπ ut + kπ π bt 1 − βρu + θκ
where kπ > 1 to guarantee uniqueness. • Difficult to implement: what is the cost push shock? • Can replace it by the output gap Rt =
kπ − σc θ(1 − ρu ) − ρu b xt + k π π bt θ
• How to measure the output gap (here this is deviation from efficient output!)
12/17
Optimal Policy under Full Commitment • The bank fully commits to a future course of actions and is credible • The program is fully dynamic min∞ Et
∞ ∑
{b xt ,b πt }t=0
τ =0
βτ
) 1( 2 π bt+τ + λb x2t+τ 2
subject to π bt = κb xt + βEt π bt+1 + ut • The optimal choice satisfies b xt = θqt bt π bt = qt−1 − qt ⇐⇒ b xt = −θp • Importance of qt−1 : Past commitment are honored. 13/17
Optimal Policy under Full Commitment
bt in NKPC • Using b xt = −θp bt+1 − (1 + β + κθ)p bt + p bt−1 + ut = 0 βEt p • Let µ be the stable root, then b t = µp bt−1 + p
ut 1 + κθ + β(1 − ρu )
14/17
Optimal Policy: Discretion vs Commitment
0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
iid Shocks
Output
0
2
4
6
Inflation
0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 8
10
Discretion,
12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Full Commitment
15/17
Optimal Policy
Main observation: The CB gets a better trade off between inflation and output at the time of the shock under commitment. This is valuable because of the convexity of the objective function.
16/17
What if steady state is not efficient?
• Under Discretion • Same response to the cost push shock as in the undistorted Steady state case. • Creates a positive inflation bias to erode the markups of the firms that have fixed prices and lead to higher output. • Increasing in the degree of inefficiency (but limit due to price dispersion)
• Under Full Commitment • The response to the cost push shock is the same as under discretion. • Average inflation converges to zero from above. Hence, policy commitment eliminates -asymptotically- the inflation bias.
Nov 1, 2005 - Earlier research on optimal monetary policy under learning uses op- ... would be optimal under rational expectations, as the central bank ex-.
Nov 1, 2005 - Optimal Fiscal Policy Rules in a Monetary Union ... Ricardian consumers, and derive optimal simple rules for fiscal authorities. ...... Numerical simulations ...... ξb â gas. Ë. Sn ab â gac. Ë. Cn a â gbc. Ë. Cn b â gay. Ë.
απ(πt - π⋆)(+εM,t). • Difficult ... How to represent monetary policy? Robustness to Indicators π⋆ β γ ρ p ..... Distortions are costly in terms of welfare because of. 1.
This system leads to a quadratic equation in γ, which has a unique positive solution, equal to 0.427, from which we get Ï = 0.029. The persistence of all the ...
âObligation to meet the 5 convergence criteria. âYearly publication of 'Convergence Reports' to assess how they meet the convergence criteria. âWhilst ...
down relative to the growth of exports and China's trade surplus will widen. .... 8.7.2 After unification the currency began to gradually appreciate, reaching a ...
Liquidity channel theories emphasize the deepening of credit markets as a result of .... extended because of the need to standardize contracts and procedures.
Mar 12, 2014 - now need to downsize their long&term project following a negative productivity shock. ... quences of financial crises and financial instability with higher bank ... Let us consider an entrepreneur investing I at date # and agreeing ...
Jul 2, 2007 - behave strikingly differently from the money market interest rates. In particular, the correlation between the rates implied by consumption Euler equations and the money market rates is strongly ..... covariance matrix of ut.
experience as a central banker and a policy adviser in an international .... In recent years, a number of OECD countries have adopted numerical inflation ...
participants at the Banco de EspanËa, BIS, and the Insead MacroWorkshop. ... 2. Technology shocks and monetary policy in a sticky price model. 2.1. A baseline ...
14 avr. 1997 - 1965, when the French began large-scale conversions of dollars into ..... restore external balance was âOperation Twistâ--an attempt to raise ...
bank intervenes by either changing its nominal interest rate or its money supply so as to .... with our 3 variables system such that the matrix S takes the form. S =.
Part of this work was done when Franck Portier was visiting scholar at the ...... 2N, households consumption is large (both because they receive the return from ...
might be intermediate, meaning that they are used only in the production of other ... t is the dividend paid by a share in sector j, Rt is the gross nominal interest ...... This finding suggest that financial frictions may also play an important role
We use a Principal Component Analysis to estimate new bubble indicators for the ... Introduction ... They arise after some positive news, generally technology innovations, ... relied on a statistical definition of the excessive level of asset prices,
characterizes the Fed's systematic response to technology shocks and its implications for U.S. ... Key feature of New Keynesian model: Nominal rigidities ..... Estimated response to a positive technological shock (sd = 1) vs Impulse response.
Sep 14, 2006 - crisis period with regression equations in Section 3. ..... that face a quadratic loss function over deviations from target indicators. See, for ...
the mild recovery in housing in the spring and the subsequent collapse, and ..... 5. See, for example, Robert E. Hall, "The Process of Inflation in the Labor Market, ...
composition of its assets, for example, by selling liquid short- term Treasury securities .... current operating procedures could not survive in this case. If the Fed ...
Retrospective econometrics vs. simulations and game theory .... towards a procedure that would be more dependent on the sizes of countries â such as a.
different days until August 2015 enables us to carefully measure the surprise .... Section 5 examines these state-dependent effects at a lower frequency. .... Decisions concern the value for the Bank of England's official interest rate – ..... robust