Mar 5, 1999 - To find the field equations we must establish covariant forms of the field strength ... The second field equation. .... had quadratic д µ ½. ¾.
PHYSICAL APPLICATIONS OF GEOMETRIC ALGEBRA LECTURE 15
SUMMARY To find the field equations we must establish covariant forms of the field strength tensor. Dimensional analysis then tells what the correct equations are. Similar considerations apply to trajectories and enable us to identify the metric. The covariant field strength tensors. The Planck scale and the magnitude of the field strength of the displacement field. Further properties of the Riemann tensor. The second field equation. Trajectories. The metric and the link with GR.
1
C OVARIANT F IELD S TRENGTHS Need covariant forms of field strength. Start with rotation
removes terms in
gauge.
. Under
displacements must have
Field strength has term in . Must transform to Picks up a term in . Remove this with suitable version of . Has ¼
¼
¼
¼
¼
so adjoint transforms as
Insert this into . Define covariant field strength Factor of alters rotation gauge properties.
¼
¼
so adjoint goes as
¼
2
by:
Summarise transformation properties of
¼
Rotations: Just what we want for a covariant tensor. Call the Displacements:
¼
¼
Riemann tensor. Understand rotation transformation from
This is ‘dilate all fields by factor ’. Transformed field is
¼
Same physical information.
D ISPLACEMENT G AUGE Key quantity is
picks up additional rotors under rotation gauge. But
Replace the directional derivatives by covariant derivatives:
T HE F IELD E QUATIONS Can get field equations from a Lagrangian and action principle. Will use dimensional analysis instead. Have 3
constants , and . Fix the natural scale for interactions:
Planck mass Planck time has dimensions of length and is dimensionless. So and differ in dimensions by a factor of length. Expect comparable in magnitude to
. Extremely small! If ignore quantum effects, expect vanishes. Gives first field equation Planck length
driven by quantum is a pure gauge, because spin.) Does not mean
(In fact, from Lagrangian analysis
field couples into covariant field strength! This coupling generates some dynamics. Also ensures that equations are (locally) those of GR!
4
C ONSEQUENCES
in form
First write
Version for vector field useful
Removes a potential ambiguity. Electromagnetic vector potential is . Covariant version is
(Because generalises ). Could generate electromagnetic field strength from or . But now both give the same result
Now extend to a bivector,
Result for position dependent fields is
5
Follows that
Holds for any . Results in an algebraic identity for the Riemann tensor
vanishes for all values of vector . 16 constraints, so left with 20 degrees of freedom.
Trivector
S ECOND F IELD E QUATION
has dimensions length . Ignoring quantum effects, so only have . Form , has dimensions of energy density. Now linear in , whereas for electromagnetism had quadratic . Expect source for gravitational fields to be matter stress-energy tensor. Need a linear function on vectors. Contract
and define Ricci tensor
(NB. Same symbol. Grade of argument distinguishes type.) Contract again to get Ricci scalar
6
Our first scalar observable. This is Lagrangian density in formal development. To get correct equation, use Jacobi Identity. One of these for all gauge theories:
So
In electromagnetism same as
. Covariant form in
gravity more work. Result is
Called the Bianchi identity. Another useful, practical result in a simple, memorable expression. On contracting Bianchi identity, find that covariantly conserved tensor is the Einstein tensor
Equate this with the covariant matter stress-energy tensor
,
Constant found from spherically symmetric solutions. Conclusion is
.
7
T RAJECTORIES AND TANGENTS
in the STA. Actual path has no
Particle follows trajectory
relevance, only values of fields encountered. What relevance can be attached to the tangent vector? After displacement
¼ new tangent vector is
where . Factor of now. Remove with . Define suitable version of
as the covariant tangent vector. Now transforms under rotation gauge
¼
No change to STA trajectory. can point wherever we like! Only constraint is invariant. Use this to distinguish spacelike, timelike and null.
8
P OINT PARTICLE E QUATIONS OF M OTION Proper (invariant) distance along trajectory now
¾
½
The proper time is therefore parameter such that
where No fields . Make this equation covariant. Have , so use (Can write this more abstractly as ) is a form of acceleration bivector. But have to be careful. is not gauge invariant. If transform to get,
to . field without Can add ‘acceleration’ term
¼
¼
¼
¼
¼
¼
¼
altering physics. Can see that gravity
acceleration gravity
¼
A form of the equivalence principle. (Einstein considered lifts accelerating and at rest in a gravitational field.) 9
Weak Equivalence Principle the motion of a test particle in a gravitational field is independent of its mass. Automatic — no mass in our equation. Means gravitational mass = inertial masses.
T HE M ETRIC AND GR
. Define Reciprocal to one another. Expand trajectory in this Introduce a coordinate frame. Coordinates
frame
In terms of this the proper distance along a path becomes
¾
½ ¾
½
Comparison with GR
gives metric as
In GR this is the fundamental object. Gives distance between points on a curved surface. In gauge theory it is derived. 10
and satisfy gauge field equations then metric
If
solves the GR Einstein equations. Minimise proper distance get geodesic equation. Same as
.
Metric independent of rotation gauge. GR never sees this. Gauge nature of GR is hidden! For metric, displacements look like coordinate transformations. Confusing! NB metric cannot be transformed away by change of coordinates.
C OVARIANT F RAMES Define useful frames
Reciprocal because
Æ
Metric now simply
Also simplify first field equation. Since
11
and
, can write as
Now complete the link with GR. We use the abbreviation
for the covariant derivative in direction. Act on vector and express result in frame:
Defines the Christoffel connection Vectors transform like (with
. ) or like (with
). Mathematicians call these vectors and 1-forms. Like -field to keep them separate. Identified by the metric. We use
to make all same type — covariant vectors. Then just have rotor group transformations.
Feb 16, 1999 - Same transformation law as for vectors. Very efficient. EXAMPLES. 1. Stationary charges in ¼ frame set up field. Ь ½ · Р¾. Second observer ...
Jan 21, 1999 - In the final section we will start to look at the GA ... (ع¼ is the velocity of the centre of mass.) We need the ... Angular momentum density is ´ ¡ µ.
Feb 9, 1999 - Projective splits for observers. ¯ Handling Lorentz transformations with rotors. ¯ Photons and redshifts. ¯ The structure of the Lorentz group. 1 ...
Feb 4, 1999 - Dot Цwith , get directional derivative in direction. ÐЦ ´Ьµ РС. ¯ ¼. ´Ь · ¯µ ´Ьµ. ¯. ´Ьµ a multivector-valued function of position. Scalar field ´Ьµ ...
Jan 26, 1999 - Complex structures and doubling bivectors. 6. Unitary groups .... Familiar? it is the polar decomposition of a complex number back again.
levels. Expanding to next order get. ÐÐ. С. ´ «µ¾. ¾Т¾. С. ´ «µ. ¾Т. Т. Р· ½. ¿. Binding energy increased slightly, and get dependence on Ð . Lifts degeneracy in ...
Jan 28, 1999 - understanding of the important subject of linear algebra. This ... GA is an index free language. Denote ... Associative so no need for brackets.
Jan 19, 1999 - Now add a third vector ¿. , orthogonal to ½ and ¾ . Generate. 3 independent bivectors. ½ ¾. ¾ ¿. ¿ ½. The expected number of independent ...
formulated as a gauge theory, but thought to be difficult and unnatural. Geometric algebra .... Lamb shift. Dirac equation accounts for fine structure. The hyperfine.
Mar 8, 1999 - symmetric source can be motivated by simple Newtonian ... Combine with symmetry relation. д .... ¾ Ð, not even light can escape â Called.
Particle in a magnetic field. ... Decompose into Pauli basis, then and. Ð. Get multivector equivalent. ½. ¾. ÒР· ¿µ. 2 .... We first write the equation in the form. Ш. ½.
Hamilton introduces his quaternions, which generalize complex numbers. But confusion persists over the status of vectors in his algebra â do ´. µ constitute the.
This property is exploited in the theory of rotations. Having established a complete geometric interpretation for the product of two vectors, we turn to consider the ...
Apr 29, 2009 - Complex numbers. Let i be the pseudoscalar of a plane in Rn. A complex number in the plane is a scalar + bivector: a+ib. Since i2 = â1, GA ...
Page 1. Geometric Algebra Primer. Jaap Suter. March 12, 2003. Page 2 .... practice. . . ...After perusing some of these, the computer scientist may well ... can express any geometric relation or concept. ...... A = (4, 8, 5, 6, 2, 4, 9, 3) â Cl3 we
Mar 12, 2003 - Adopted with great enthusiasm in physics, geometric algebra slowly emerges in computational .... A computer scientist first pointed to geometric algebra as a ...... In Cl4 a bivector takes six scalars, and a trivector takes four scalar
Maxplus scalars and matrices in Scilab. 3. Input-Output Max-Plus Linear Systems. 3.1. Transfer Functions. 3.2. Rational Series. 4. Dynamical Maxplus Linear ...
Formulas and equations. F. Using formulas. 1. Changing the subject of a formula - Higher. 2. Re-arranging symbols. 3. Index notation. 4. Solving equations. 5.
ations. We present results on i) linear algebra, ii) system theory, iii) duality between .... may be called dynamic programming with independent instantaneous costs (c de- ..... Feller, W.: An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications.
The types of data required are related to the engineering, social and demographic, ... revolutionized by advanced photogrammetric and computer techniques.Missing: