Results - International Workshop on PET in Lymphoma

O. Casasnovas , Hematologie Clinique, Hopital Le Bocage Dijon (F). M Hutchings, Onco-Hematology Dept. RigHospitalet, Copenhagen (DK). P. Brice, HDJ ...
375KB taille 6 téléchargements 354 vues
International Validation Study of the Prognostic Role of Interim-PET Scan in ABVD-treated, Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Results

Third international workshop on interim-PET in lymphoma Menton (France), Palais de l’Europe, September 26-27th, 2011

2nd-line chemotherapy Median follow-up 37.6 months 46/261 (18%)

PET2PET2+

patients were PET2 positive

· 30/46 (65%) of them had a treatment failure -26 had treatment intensification for disease progression - 4 had a relapse

46

215

215/261 (82%)

patients were PET2 negative

· 11 (5%) of them had a treatment failure - 9 had treatment intensification for disease progression - 2 had a relapse

46 • • • •

patients changed therapy: 41 after a median of 7.86 months (range 2-34) at clinical progression 1 after 2 months due to PET findings in isolation 3 after 3 months for clinical evidence of disease progression 1 after 4 months due to PET findings in isolation.

PET Review Process Baseline PET-0

Interim (after 2 ABVD cycle) PET-2

DEAUVILLE 5-point scale no uptake uptake ≤ mediastinum uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver moderately increased uptake compared to liver markedly increased uptake compared to liver

PET negative PET positive

1-st line treatment outcome according to PET-2 and IPS IPS 0-2

IPS 3-7

260

195

PET-2 +

25

65

170

CR 4 PRO 15 REL 6

PET-2 +

PET-2 -

25

CR 9 PRO 12 REL 3

PET-2 CR 38 PRO 1 REL 1

IPS 3-7

261

190 24

40

CR 3 PRO 21 REL 1

CR 162 PRO 6 REL 2

IPS 0-2

PET-2 +

JCO 2007

IVS 2011

71

166

PET-2 CR 159 PRO 6 REL 1

PET-2 +

22

CR 7 PRO 14 REL 1

49

PET-2 CR 45 PRO 3 REL 1

Predictive value on treatment outcome Parameter True Positive True Negative False Positive False Negative Sensitivity Specificity Positive Predictive Value Negative Predictive Value

IVS 30 204 16 11 0.732 [0.678,0.785] 0.927 [0.896,0.959] 0.652 [0.594,0.710] 0.949 [0.922,0.976]

JCO 44 199 6 11 0.81 0.97 0.93 0.92

FFS for all patients (N= 261) Failure Free Survival 5-y FFS= 95%

1,0

PET2 negative

0,8

PET2 positive

0,6 0,4 5-y FFS= 35%

0,2 0,0 0

Time [months]

60

FFS according to PET-2 and IPS (N= 261) Failure Free Survival 1,0 IPS 0-2, PET2 negative IPS 0-2, PET2 positive IPS 3-7, PET2 negative IPS 3-7, PET2 positive

0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0,0 0

Time [months] 60

Acknowledgements G. Mikhaeel, Medical Oncology, Guy & St. Thomas Hospital London (UK) E. Dann, Hematology Dept. Rambam Medical Center, Haifa (IL) M. Coleman, Hematology Dept. Cornell University New York (USA) J. Seymour , Hematology Dept. Peter Mc Callum Cancer center, Melbourne (A) O. Casasnovas , Hematologie Clinique, Hopital Le Bocage Dijon (F) M Hutchings, Onco-Hematology Dept. RigHospitalet, Copenhagen (DK) P. Brice, HDJ Hematologie Hopital Saint Louis Paris (F) JM Zaucha, Onco-hematology Dept. Gdynia University Gdansk (P) L. Trentin, Experimental medicine, Hematology and Immunology Dept., Padua (I) U. Vitolo, Hematology Dept., Ospedale S. Giovanni Battista, Torino (I) S. Viviani, M. Gianni, Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori, Milano (I) C. Stelitano, Hematology Dept., Poloiclinico A. Melacrino, Reggio Calabria (I) A. Levis: Hematology Dept., Ospedale S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria (I) K. Patti, Hematology Dept. , Ospedale “ A. Cervello”, Palermo, (I) G. Di Raimondo, Hematology Dept. and BMT Unit, University of Catania, (I) S. Bolis Hematology Dept. Ospedale S. Gerardo, Monza (I) F. Fiore, C. Castellino Hematology Dept. S. Croce Hospital Cuneo (I)

For Imaging exchange we thank J. Fortineau Keosys, Nantes, France A. Stancu, PG Cerello, Dixit S.r.L, Italy